The human mind can hardly remain entirely free from bias, and decisive opinions are often formed before a thorough examination of a subject from all its aspects has been made. This is said with reference to the prevailing double mistake a of limiting Theosophy to Buddhism: We theosophists of India are ourselves the real culprits, although, at the time, we did our best to correct the mistake. See Theosophist, June,
Neither problems nor puzzles yield often to the first attack. Full of peaks and valleys, seduction and rejection, ecstasy and despair, marked by moments of brilliant lucidity and shadowed by whispers of madness.
I see it often in the forums through the questions that are being asked and the passionate stories that are communicated.
From my perspective, I had just completed what should have been the most spectacular life changing event imaginable. However, I was shockingly surprised when nothing had appeared to change.
I was just a boy then, barely eleven, and the questions that occurred to me truly arose from a state of childlike faith. The problem I faced was that my experiences did not line up with my expectations.
They all testified of their amazing life changing experience, their joyous walk with God, and undoubtable experience of blessed assurance. To make a long, very long story short I believed as they did, I drank from their trough and yet my thirst was not quenched.
I could not find within myself anything that convinced me that my blessedness was assured. I had done, said, prayed, and believed every aspect of the religious doctrine pontificated to me from birth.
Nevertheless at a time when I should be experiencing similar results to those who lead the way, I was not. As time passed I observed my friends, neighbors, and even complete strangers begin to testify of their very own joyous walk and blessed assurance after they too whole heartedly believed and confessed the church doctrine.
To put it lightly, I truly began to believe I was the odd-man-out and somehow was completely missing the boat. I never absolutely lost faith, but found it much easier to stop expecting a joyous walk and blessed assurance, especially since I had become convinced at a very early age that God did not have much interest in my soul.
Of course this perception was not the best attitude in life to adapt. Ultimately I discovered I was running from accepting an extremely negative alternative. No matter how hard I tried to solve the puzzle, in all honesty, I could not fervently testify to the selfsame results as those who bore witness and sought to spread the good news within my faith community.
As the years passed I discovered many ways to run from God, but never a place of rest. This God thing never went away. No matter what I found myself doing in life I could not get away from my broken religious heritage and inability to experience the tell-tale signs of personal salvation. Eventually I decided to stop running, turn and face my pursuer.
However, this time I figured I would need a broader sampling of witnesses consequently I did not restrict my quest for the experience of blessed assurance to just one faith community. As time went on I had not merely explored multiple faith communities, but multiple religious variants and even considered God from the viewpoint of other traditions.
This seemed a risky endeavor for a person with my Southern Baptist heritage to pursue, but I could not ignore my desire to experience God and besides that, I was pretty much a black sheep of the Baptist fold anyhow.
Paradigm is one of those words I had strongly avoided. And to those of you who have made that statement on this site in times past let me reassure you I agree to an extent. Pajares outline of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions as well as interweave in my own spiritual parallelisms and factoids.
What follows is that condensed view of Kuhnian paradigm methodology… Paradigm: Some notable characteristics of a paradigm are: But more successful does not mean completely successful!
Normal science consists in the actualization of that promise. In this area of what Kuhn describes as normal science devotees of the paradigm are practicing puzzle solving.
In this puzzle solving mindset followers of the paradigm undertake empirical work to: A striking feature of doing normal science i. This type of activity should produce new information and a more precise paradigm, but if the puzzle solving being practiced is so ridged and paradigmatic communities so devote, how can paradigm change take place?
The process of paradigm change is closely tied to the nature of perceptual conceptual change in an individual.
Discovery begins with the awareness of anomaly, the recognition that nature has violated the paradigm-induced expectations that govern normal science paradigm based puzzle solving. This creates a phenomenon for which a paradigm has not readied the seeker.
After perceiving an anomaly within the paradigm the investigator i. In other words, a process of discovery begins based on the awareness of the anomaly.Fideisms Judaism is the Semitic monotheistic fideist religion based on the Old Testament's ( BCE) rules for the worship of Yahweh by his chosen people, the children of Abraham's son Isaac (c BCE)..
Zoroastrianism is the Persian monotheistic fideist religion founded by Zarathustra (cc BCE) and which teaches that good must be chosen over evil in order to achieve salvation. In western Eurasia, the ancient traditions of the Slavic religion contained elements of monotheism.
In the sixth century AD, the Byzantine chronicler Procopius recorded that the Slavs "acknowledge that one god, creator of lightning, is the only lord of all: to him do they sacrifice an ox and all sacrificial animals.".
Support your Gnostic Society and Ecclesia: Click and add this rutadeltambor.com Bookmark to your favorites (Internet Explorer and Firefox). Use our link when you go to rutadeltambor.com You get the same low Amazon prices, and we receive a small commission that supports our non-profit efforts.
"Hum Appendix H Monotheistic Religion Elements Matrix" Essays and Research Papers. Hum Appendix H Monotheistic Religion Elements Matrix. Axia College Material Elements of Religion Essay. Elements of Religion Essay Christopher Abish REL March 6.
Free Essays on Monotheistic Religion Elements Matrix for students. Use our papers to help you with yours 1 - This trope comes into play when the supreme deity of a given setting is not just a mere jerkass — he/she/it is actively malevolent, a jealous, callous, sadistic, monstrous tyrant who created the world or universe to be such a miserable Crapsack World, preparing Disproportionate Retribution and an.